USPTO serial 88697423
IHEMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IHEMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North York, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Honeah Sohail Mangione
Honeah Sohail Mangione ELLENOFF GROSSMAN, AND SCHOLE LLP1345 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK CITY, NY 10105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Computer-integrated manufacturing system comprised of industrial machinery for producing decorticated biomass agricultural products; computer-integrated manufacturing systems comprised of a decorticator and a baler for decortication of dicotyledonous plants, namely, hemp, flax, kenaf, and jute; computer-integrated manufacturing systems comprised of a decorticator for fibre processing of decorticated biomass agricultural products; computer-integrated manufacturing systems comprised of a baler for baling of decorticated biomass agricultural products; computer-integrated manufacturing systems comprised of a pulverizer for compounding of decorticated biomass agricultural products; computer-integrated manufacturing systems comprised of a pellet mill for pelletizing of decorticated biomass agricultural products | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable computer-aided manufacturing software for processing decorticated biomass agricultural products; electronic control systems for machines; manufacturing control systems comprised of electronic controls for manufacturing machines for processing decorticated biomass agricultural products; automated process control systems, namely, micro-processor based hardware and recorded software used to monitor and control the status of industrial sensors, systems, and machinery used in decortication processing; downloadable computer software to monitor and control decortication processes; computer-integrated manufacturing system comprised of industrial automation controls, computer hardware for monitoring manufacturing machinery status, and downloadable and recorded computer aided manufacturing software, all for producing decorticated biomass agricultural products | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Decorticated dicotyledonous plant bast fibre and hurd, namely bast fibre and hurd from hemp, flax, kenaf, and jute; chopped bast, namely raw fibrous textile materials derived from decorticated dicotyledonous plant components; hurd derived from decorticated dicotyledonous plant components, namely, raw fibrous textile materials; dust derived from the process of decorticating dicotyledonous plants, namely, ground plant fibers for filler in composite materials used in the manufacture of consumer and industrial goods; blends of hurd, short fibre and cut bast from decorticated dicotyledonous plants, namely, hemp fibers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |