USPTO serial 88698367
THE COLORIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECHHOFER, YOCHEVED D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE COLORIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yue (Robert) Xu
Yue (Robert) Xu APEX ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP160 ALAMO PLAZA #942ALAMO, CA 94507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Facial cleansers; Stain removers; Essential oils; Cosmetics; Cosmetic pencils; Sunscreen preparations; Nail polish; Nail care preparations; Dentifrices; Sachets for perfuming linen; Hair styling spray; Skin creams; Perfumes; False nails; Cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; Mouthwashes, not for medical purposes; Bath foams; Hand lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2020 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |