USPTO serial 88698925
SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLOWAY, CHRISTINA DENISE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
Minato-ku, Tokyo, JP
Minato-ku, Tokyo, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. Scott Alprin ALPRIN LAW OFFICES, P.C.5 PINEHURST CIRCLE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and publicity services; business management analysis and business consultancy, marketing research, professional business consultancy, providing information concerning commercial sales; promoting the goods and services of others by distributing coupons and trading stamps; document reproduction in the nature of photocopying services; accounting; office functions, namely, filing, in particular documents or magnetic tapes; compilation of information into computer databases, data search in computer files for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and instruction services, namely, providing instruction in the field of arts, crafts, sports and general knowledge relating to sports and sports technology; arranging, conducting and organization of seminars; arranging and planning of movies, shows, plays or musical performances; movie theatre presentations and movie film production and distribution; providing non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of articles, videos, books and magazines in the field of entertainment and sports; production of radio and television program; production of videotape film in the field of education, culture, entertainment and sports, not for movie or television programs and not for advertising or publicity; organization, arranging and conducting of sports competitions; organization of social entertainment events excluding movies, shows, plays, musical performances, sports, horse races, bicycle races, boat races and auto races; entertainment information; providing online non-downloadable images in the field of entertainment and sports, videos featuring entertainment and sports, music and online computer and online video games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DENTSU GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Dentsu Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dentsu Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DENTSU INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO SPORTS TECH TOKYO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2020 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2020 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2020 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |