USPTO serial 88699098
ASKLIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASKLIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winter Park, FL
Winter Park, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer application software for multipurpose mobile devices which allows a user to create, store and share video, text, images, and data content on social media networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Streaming of audio and audiovisual programs featuring news, information and commentary in the field of entertainment, and streaming real time news content via the internet and other communications networks; Electronic messaging system, namely, electronic queuing services for use in the coordination of ongoing communications for automatic messaging; Telecommunication services, namely, providing e-mail notification alerts via the Internet; providing online forums for the transmission of information, audio, video among users of computing and via mobile devices in an online community | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment, namely, television news shows and radio news shows; Providing news in the nature of current event reporting | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software to enable recording, transmitting, showing, displaying, blogging, sharing, streaming and transmitting of electronic media, video, real-time news and entertainment content and other information; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software to enable uploading, creating, posting, editing, showing, displaying, blogging, sharing, streaming and transmitting of electronic media, video, real-time news, entertainment content, or information; Providing a web hosting platform featuring temporary use of non- downloadable software allowing users to upload, post, display, stream, and share videos and digital content; Creating an online community for registered users to engage in social networking; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for the integration of video content into websites, applications, and third-party software; Creating an online community for registered users to share and stream information, audio, video, real-time news, entertainment content, or information, to form virtual communities, and to engage in social networking | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Online social networking services; providing social networking services on the internet and other communication networks for entertainment purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Theodore A Stoner
- Other trademarks owned by Theodore A Stoner
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ASKLIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2025 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2023 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 18, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |