USPTO serial 88699388
SKYBLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKYBLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bonita Springs, FL, US
Bonita Springs, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. SCHWAB
MICHAEL J. SCHWAB MORITT HOCK & HAMROFF LLP1407 BROADWAY39TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer programming services, namely, content creation for virtual worlds and three dimensional platforms; Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to engage in gaming and virtual worlds; Computer services, namely, creating an on-line virtual environment for gaming and social interaction; Computer services, namely, providing gaming and virtual world servers to others; Designing and modifying computer programs and video games for others; Hosting of digital content on the Internet; Programming virtual content and goods for use in online virtual worlds; Server hosting | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2026 | OP.D | OP.DS (DISMISSED IN PART/SUSTAINED IN PART) | — |
| May 11, 2026 | OP.D | OP.DS (DISMISSED IN PART/SUSTAINED IN PART) | — |
| May 15, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |