Drawing for BRANDS VS. BARCODES

USPTO serial 88699470

BRANDS VS. BARCODES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRANDS VS. BARCODES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tom Zellerbach & Eileen Aghnami

Tom Zellerbach & Eileen Aghnami ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST., SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; marketing consulting, namely, development of marketing campaigns for others; marketing services for execution of marketing campaigns for others; online advertising and marketing services; advertising and marketing consultancy; automated marketing services; marketing consulting, namely, development of media marketing campaigns; marketing services for execution of media marketing campaigns for others; providing demand creation and lead generation services and advice related theretoACTIVE—
042Graphic design of marketing materials for others for marketing campaigns and media marketing campaignsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 26, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance