CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HI-Q

USPTO serial 88700033

HI-Q

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI-Q?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Anna McCoy

B. Anna McCoy MCCOY RUSSELL LLP1410 NW Johnson StreetSUITE 201Portland, OR 97209

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029(Based on Intent to Use) Canned fish; canned meat; canned vegetables; canned fruits; vegetarian food made from the protein of canned plants, namely, tofu; frozen shrimps; frozen meat; goods, namely, soup made from meat; soup; vegetable soup; soup extract from meat; milk; corn oil for food; sesame oil for food; canola oil used as food; palm oil used as food; olive oil used as food; coconut oil for food; sunflower seed oil used as food; lard; cheese; pickled vegetablesACTIVE—
030(Based on 44(e)) Packaged meals consisting primarily of rice in a sealed container; packaged meals consisting primarily of instant frozen rice; packaged meals consisting primarily of canned rice; ready-cooked rice; prepared meals consisting primarily of steamed rice and also including steamed chicken meat; (Based on 1(b)) Ketchup; chili sauce; soy sauce; ready-cooked stir-fry sauce, namely, black pepper sauce; oyster sauce; rice-based ready-cooked food, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of riceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 21, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance