USPTO serial 88701247
S ANCHOR PAYMENT SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, OLIVIA SUNMIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with S ANCHOR PAYMENT SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ASHLEY D. JOHNSON
ASHLEY D. JOHNSON DOGWOOD PATENT AND TRADEMARK LAW4801 GLENWOOD AVE., STE 200RALEIGH, NC 27612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Merchant services, namely, payment transaction processing services; credit card and debit card payment processing services; credit card and debit card transaction processing services | ACTIVE | Mar 13, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |