Drawing for ZKITTLEZ HEMP Z

USPTO serial 88703373

ZKITTLEZ HEMP Z

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ZKITTLEZ HEMP Z?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK I REICHENTHAL

MARK I REICHENTHAL BRANFMAN MAYFIELD BUSTARDE REICHENTHAL LLP462 STEVENS AVENUE, SUITE 303SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Smokable hemp flower with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Substances for smoking, namely, CBD concentrates and CBD oil infusions solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, namely, electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; trays for rolling hemp cigarettes containing only hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basisABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2023MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 18, 2023ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 18, 2023OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 18, 2023OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 10, 2022OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 10, 2022OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 4, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2021ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 16, 2021PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 29, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2019MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance