USPTO serial 88704356
NO GUILT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO GUILT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie L. Reed
Julie L. Reed MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP500 Broadway StreetSuite 400Vancouver, WA 98660Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Specialist food goods including but not limited to Keto, low-carb, diabetic, paleo, nut allergy, lactose intolerance, gluten free, clean eating, vegetarian and/or vegan friendly including but not limited to bread, cookies, scones, muffins, tortillas, pizza bases, rolls, pastries, cheesecakes, crackers, kits for baking or desert making, products for baking or desert making; including but not limited to ingredients, kits of and/or prepared spices, essences, and spice mixes; pastas; salads, meals; snacks; drinks; teas; smoothies; salad dressings; condiments; sauces; jams and jellies; candies; confectioneries; ice creams and sorbets; puddings | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail and wholesale food store services featuring specialist food goods including but not limited to Keto, low-carb, diabetic, paleo, nut allergy, lactose intolerance, gluten free, clean eating, vegetarian and/or vegan friendly including but not limited to bread, cookies, scones, muffins, tortillas, pizza bases, rolls, pastries, cheesecakes, crackers, kits for baking or desert making, products for baking or desert making; including but not limited to ingredients, kits of and/or prepared spices, essences, and spice mixes; pastas; salads, meals; snacks; drinks; teas; smoothies; salad dressings; condiments; sauces; jams and jellies; candies; confectioneries; ice creams and sorbets; puddings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |