USPTO serial 88704972
PATROLBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATROLBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Todd Timmerman
J. Todd Timmerman SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP101 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SUITE 2800TAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | industrial robots, namely, robots used to monitor, detect, and report anomalies in indoor and outdoor environments | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | security surveillance robots; automated, self-contained, electronic surveillance devices that can be deployed to gather information or intelligence in remote locations; downloadable software for use in the management, remote viewing, monitoring, programming, and controlling of security monitoring devices; downloadable software for receiving security alerts and security information updates | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | outsource service provider in the field of business analytics; business assistance, advisory, and consulting services in the field of surveillance of remote locations, namely, monitoring and detecting anomalies in indoor and outdoor environments, reporting such anomalies to a security operations center so that they may be identified and addressed, and archiving data regarding such anomalies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | electronic storage services for archiving electronic data regarding surveilled premises with time and date records and images related to such surveillance; electronic storage services for archiving electronic data in the nature of analytics and reports on surveilled premises; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software that enables users to view data, analytics, and reports regarding the surveillance of premises; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for use in the management, remote viewing, monitoring, programming, and controlling of security monitoring devices; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for receiving security alerts and security information updates | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | surveillance services; providing security surveillance of premises for others; premises security monitoring using security surveillance robots; rental of security surveillance robots | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Badger Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Badger Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PATROLBOT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |