USPTO serial 88706224
PERSONALIZED INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 2020
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PERSONALIZED INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells LEGENDS LAW GROUP, PLLC330 MAIN ST.KAYSVILLE, UT 84037United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use by business enterprises for the purpose of providing individualized improvement suggestions to increase the business's customer and employee experience performance; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use by business enterprises for the purpose of providing real-time benchmarking of the business's customer experience performance compared to peer groups, lines of business, and world-class performers; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use by business enterprises for the purpose of benchmarking an individual's customer experience performance and conducting artificial intelligence based on the individual's performance by automatically identifying coaching opportunities, providing relevant best practices for targeted improvement, suggesting specific questions to add to individual surveys focusing on areas of improvement, and awarding points that can be redeemed for personalized debit cards or gifts; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use by business enterprises for the purpose of measuring the business's improved customer experience, and displaying relevant benchmarking data; and software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in the fields of business and market research for the purpose of analyzing surveys and data, providing analytics, and providing customer experience insights | ACTIVE | Sep 14, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |