Drawing for SHUTTLE PIN

USPTO serial 88707416

SHUTTLE PIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHUTTLE PIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F WILLIAM MCLAUGHLIN

F WILLIAM MCLAUGHLIN WOOD PHILLIPS KATZ CLARK & MORTIMER500 W MADISON STREETSUITE 1130CHICAGO, IL 60661-2562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical device, namely, a needle for advancing an elongated flexible suture through a part of a human bodyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 13, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 7, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 7, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 23, 2022EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 28, 2022RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Mar 23, 2022GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2022GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2022CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 7, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 8, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 8, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance