Drawing for ULTRACOL

USPTO serial 88709886

ULTRACOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRACOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sangwon Kim

Sangwon Kim REVOLUTION IP, PLLC2000 DUKE STREET, SUITE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Lifting thread for medical thread inserter; embedding thread, plastic surgical; body insertion surgical thread; thread, surgical; medical thread; massage apparatus; skin esthetic massage apparatus; massaging apparatus for personal use; medical ultrasound apparatus; medical ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus; ultrasonic therapy apparatus; ultrasonic massaging apparatus; cosmestic apparatus using ultrasound for performing aesthetic skin treatment procedures on for face; esthetic facial massage apparatus for skin whitening effect; medical skin cosmetic equipment with high frequency, namely, lasers for the cosmetic treatment of the face and skin; esthetic medical ultrasound apparatus; ultrashort wave esthetic therapy machines for medical purposes; electronic medical aesthetic skin treatment devices using light emitting diodes, namely, infrared, red, orange, yellow, green, and blue wavelengths for generating light rays; ultrasonic medical diagnostic apparatus, namely, medical filler appratus; medical filler syringesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 1, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance