USPTO serial 88710758
GEROVITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OJEYEMI, ASHLEY CHRISTINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GEROVITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IARA N MORTON
709# QIAODAN CENTERNO 86 ANLING SECOND RD HULI DISTRICTXIAMEN, 361015Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Bags and cases specially adapted for holding or carrying electric hair curling irons; Beard clippers; Depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; Egg slicers, non-electric; Electric flat irons; Electric hair crimper; Electric hair cutters; Electric razors and electric hair clippers; Gardening tools, namely, trowels, weeding forks, spades, hoes; Hair clippers for children, animals, dogs; Hand-operated kitchen appliance for dicing, slicing and chopping food; Hand-powered staple guns; Hobby knives; Knife bags; Manually operated hand tools, namely, screwdrivers, shovels, wrenches, hammers, pincers; Non-electric fruit peelers; Razor blades; Tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; Tin openers, non-electric; Vegetable slicers | ABANDONED | Oct 28, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2022 | KSCO | SHOW CAUSE ORDER | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 26, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |