Drawing for A88 HEMP

USPTO serial 88711407

A88 HEMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COUGHLAN, REBECCA D.
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A88 HEMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad R. Maurer

Brad R. Maurer DENTONS BINGHAM GREENEBAUM LLP10 WEST MARKET STREET2700 MARKET TOWERINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skin and body topical lotions, creams, salves and lip balms, all of the foregoing for cosmetic purposes, essential oils for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic bath salts not for medical purposes, all of the foregoing containing CBD oil derived from hemp; any CBD in the goods being solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 20, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 17, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 28, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 27, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance