USPTO serial 88711996
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ain Sebba, Casablanca, MA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter A. Rodgers
6100 LAKE FORREST DRIVE, SUITE 340ATLANTA, GA 30328UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Deodorant soap; soap for brightening textile; almond soap; shaving soap; soap for foot perspiration; perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; hair lotions; dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Works of art made of porcelain, ceramic, earthenware, terra-cotta and glass; table plates; window boxes; towel rails and rings; candle drip rings; soap boxes; tea caddies; boxes of glass; candy boxes; busts of porcelain, ceramic, earthenware, terra-cotta and glass; serving trays; decanters; candlesticks; mugs; china ornaments; dishes; pottery, namely, earthenware bowls; salad bowls; soup bowls; sugar bowls; nonelectric tajines; teapots of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2020 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |