Drawing for INTERNETTY

USPTO serial 88715361

INTERNETTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERNETTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine C. Washington, Esq.

244 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2660NEW YORK, NY 10001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable entertainment podcasts in the field of current events and popular cultureACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts, radio and online Internet programs in the field of current events and popular cultureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2021FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jun 25, 2021ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 24, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 24, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 8, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance