USPTO serial 88715555
B BOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B BOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart N. Mesher
Stewart N. Mesher Spencer Fane LLP816 Congress Ave. #1200Austin, TX 78701United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cloud based downloadable e-commerce software for users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; cloud based downloadable computer software for running development programs and application programs; cloud based downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for website and web-based e-commerce database transaction management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing online non-downloadable e-commerce software for users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; providing online non-downloadable computer software for running development programs and application programs; advisory services in the field of software product development and quality improvement of software; design and development services for software and software applications; hosting and maintenance of an internet website for others containing information on software, advisory services in the field of software product development and quality improvement of software, computer programming services, and software applications and software design and development services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |