USPTO serial 88715848
FORTRAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with FORTRAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole M. Meyer
Nicole M. Meyer DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1825 EYE STREET, N.W., SUITE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Traffic control equipment and accessories, namely, traffic light signaling devices, and accessories specially adapted therefor, namely, hangers, brackets, poles, support arms, luminous or mechanical traffic signs, backboards, and snow cap visors, bicycle and pedestrian traffic signals, signal LEDs; Solar-powered luminous beacons and flashers; Traffic control hardware, namely, traffic detection devices, traffic controllers, pedestrian crosswalk controllers; batteries used for traffic control systems and uninterruptable battery backup systems comprised mainly of a central backup unit, batteries, heater mats, and a bypass switch, used for traffic control equipment; electronic devices, namely, pedestrian accessibility pushbutton stations to assist the visually impaired with street crossings; Traffic detection devices, namely, in-ground loop devices, radar traffic detection systems, detector cards, Cabinet Interface Units; Pre-emption systems for emergency vehicles, comprised of Optical Processing Unit and Optical detector/receiver; radar speed detection signs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Management services for traffic operation centres for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of traffic control equipment; consulting services for others in the field of the maintenance and repair of traffic control equipment and systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Consulting services for others in the field of the manufacture of traffic control equipment and systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services for others in the field of the design of traffic control equipment and systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fortran Traffic Systems Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FORTRAN
- Prosecution event GNRN explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |