Drawing for STAFFALERT

USPTO serial 88716208

STAFFALERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAFFALERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J. POWELL

Michael J. Powell POWELL IP LAW, LLC10 GLENLAKE PARKWAY, SUITE 130ATLANTA, GA 30328UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software platform systems for use in facilitating communications during an urgent incident, such as a medical event, person-to-person confrontation, emergency or other crisis, including empowering onsite users to report quick and accurate information directly to first responders and system administrators, enabling first responders to determine and provide appropriate, proportional, and responsive assistance timely, and providing a system for collecting data regarding the disposition of the incident for analysis, once the incident is resolved or the urgency decreased, directed toward further improving communications among onsite users and first responders, and more responsive, effective assistance from first responders and administratorsACTIVEOct 1, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 16, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 16, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 6, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 22, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 16, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 16, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 16, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 16, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 23, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance