USPTO serial 88718302
PHARMACIELO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II,EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHARMACIELO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne A. Henley
Julianne A. Henley SPARROW IP PLLC1567 HIGHLANDS DRIVE NE, SUITE 110-290ISSAQUAH, WA 98029United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of smoker's articles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |