USPTO serial 88718332
PHARMACIELO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II,EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHARMACIELO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne A. Henley
Julianne A. Henley SPARROW IP PLLC1567 HIGHLANDS DRIVE NE, SUITE 110-290ISSAQUAH, WA 98029United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Oils, waxes for use in the manufacture of other products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |