USPTO serial 88718385
PHARMACIELO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHARMACIELO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne A. Henley
Julianne A. Henley SPARROW IP PLLC1567 HIGHLANDS DRIVE NE, SUITE 110-290ISSAQUAH, WA 98029United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Hemp and hemp derivatives; Derivatives of hemp, namely, oils, not for medical use; Smoker's articles, namely, botanical oils, not comprised of essential oils, for use in filling electronic cigarettes and oral smokeless vaporizer cartridges; electronic cigarettes and oral smokeless vaporizers sold pre-filled with flavored botanical oils, not including essential oils; oral smokeless vaporizers and electronic cigarettes sold pre-filled with hemp derivatives in the nature of flavored liquids not comprised of essential oils; Cannabidiol and hemp for recreational use; Herbs for smoking; Tobacco grinders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |