USPTO serial 88718439
PHARMACIELO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II,EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHARMACIELO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne A. Henley
Julianne A. Henley SPARROW IP PLLC1567 HIGHLANDS DRIVE NE, SUITE 110-290ISSAQUAH, WA 98029United StatesGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |