USPTO serial 88719203
JOSHUA TREE BREWERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOSHUA TREE BREWERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Joshua Tree, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE L. STEELE
GEORGE L. STEELE LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE L. STEELE2222 FOOTHILL BLVD, STE 301LA CANADA, CA 91011UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |