USPTO serial 88722652
CLEARINGHOUSE MODEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2021
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CLEARINGHOUSE MODEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $975
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Uly S. Gunn
Uly S. Gunn ALSTON & BIRD LLP1201 West Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Administration and management of pricing programs for pharmaceuticals; providing a pricing program in the field of prescription benefit plans | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2020 |
| 036 | Pharmaceutical benefits management services; reimbursement payment processing the the field of medical and pharmaceutical claims; insurance claims processing in the field of medical and pharmaceutical claims | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2020 |
| 042 | Platform-as-a-service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in prescription benefit plan management for health plans and other large payers | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 20, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 5, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |