USPTO serial 88723304
BATCHTEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BATCHTEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automated test equipment comprising industrial computers, electronic control-panels, power-supplies, electronic data acquisition devices, electronic control devices and cables for testing electronic devices, electronic equipment, embedded systems, electronic military equipment, silicon wafers, medical devices, materials used in biotechnology research and manufacturing, prototype goods, manufactured goods, and manufacturing processes for use in scientific and engineering research and development, manufacturing, electronic device calibration, and process automation, and user's manuals and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith; electrical integrated control systems, namely, automation control systems and related components for use in scientific and engineering research and development, and process automation, and user's manuals and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith; computer hardware and downloadable and recorded software for manually and automatically managing and synchronizing data and functionality instructions of one or more electronic devices used for automated industrial operations, using intranet or the internet, and user's manuals and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith; computer hardware and downloadable and recorded software for automation of tests and processes, enabling a user to author, edit, secure, locally manage, remotely manage, execute, evaluate, verify, monitor, collect data, store data, report, react to, one or more sequences of commands and queries in order to automate tests and processes, and user's manuals and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith; downloadable and recorded software for creating, viewing, manipulating, editing, animating, managing, indexing, organizing, transferring, synchronizing, and storing digital and graphic images and photographs, data, and text, namely, for creating Human-Machine-Interface, and user's manuals and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith; downloadable software for use in design and managing content on a website and enabling internet publishing; computer hardware and downloadable and recorded software and electronic devices in the nature of data acquisition and automated control IoT devices and embedded system modules for use in the fields of industrial or factory or home automation, scientific and engineering data acquisition, rapid prototyping, automated testing in manufacturing process, automated testing during research and development of products, control and analysis and for controlling, monitoring and emulating scientific and engineering instruments and instrumentation systems, and for performing instrumentation functions, and for interacting with database, and for interacting with a computer server on an intranet or internet, and instruction manuals sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2025 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 29, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |