USPTO serial 88724491
INTERVENTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERVENTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean F. Mellino
Sean F. Mellino Dinsmore & Shohl LLP1001 Lakeside Ave., Suite 990North Point TowerCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of computer networking hardware and computer datacenter architecture; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for financing and investing in the industrial, educational, entertainment and research endeavors; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for business fundraising for others; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for project financing in the field of technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |