USPTO serial 88727913
HUPZAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILL, JAMES T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUPZAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Accounting machines; Acoustic alarms; Adapter plugs; Amplifiers; Angle gauges; Anti-glare glasses; Audio amplifiers; Automatic answering machines; Baby monitors; Bar code printers; Batteries; Battery chargers; Binoculars; Blank optical discs; Blank USB cards; Calculators; Camcorders; Camera tripods; Cameras; Car stereos; Car video recorders; Cases for children's eye glasses; CD players; Cell phone covers; Cell phones; Chains for eyeglasses; Computer bags; Computer chips; Computer keyboards; Computer keypads; Computer monitors; Computer screens; Computers; Contact lenses; Cyclists' glasses; Digital door locks; Document printers; Ear buds; Ear phones; Earphones; Electric door bells; Electronic locks; Eye glass cases; Eye glasses; Eyeglass cords; Eyeglasses; Eyewear; Facsimile machines; Fire alarms; Flash bulbs; Frames for spectacles; Fridge magnets; Glasses for sports; Goggles for scuba diving; Headphones; Jukeboxes; Loud speakers; Microphones; Mobile phones; Mousepads; Multimedia projectors; Notebook and laptop computers; Phonographs; Photocopying machines; Power adapters; Rearview cameras for vehicles; Remote controls for projectors; Remote controls for televisions; Safety helmets; Scales; Scanners; Ski glasses; Smart watches; Smartglasses; Spectacles; Sports glasses; Sports' glasses; Stands for photographic apparatus; Sun glasses; Sunglasses; Swim goggles; Tablet computer; Telephones; Televisions; Thermal copiers; Timers; USB cables; Walkie-talkies; Weighing machines; Wireless routers; Audio recorders; Blank audio tapes; Motorcycle helmets; Protective eyeglasses; Sports helmets; Tape recorders; Video projectors; Videotape recorders | PARTIALLY PAID | Jun 10, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024 | CRAF | AMENDMENT CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2021 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | RTTP | RESTORE TO TEAS PLUS | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | PBMR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |