Drawing for MOSS

USPTO serial 88729962

MOSS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOSS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PEJMAN YEDIDSION

Pejman Yedidsion Brooks Acordia IP Law, PC11601 Wilshire Blvd., Fifth FloorLos Angeles, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineACTIVEOct 1, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 11, 2021EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 19, 2021GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2021GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2021CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 3, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 10, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 10, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 21, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 21, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 25, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance