Drawing for ADAPTIPEDIC

USPTO serial 88732109

ADAPTIPEDIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADAPTIPEDIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

William C. Wright EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 EAST 42ND STREET, SUITE 2520NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Polyurethane foam for use in the manufacture of furniture and bedding by third partiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 21, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 18, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 16, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance