USPTO serial 88735275
WINEOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINEOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
William C. Wright EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 EAST 42ND STREET, SUITE 2520NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Adhesive labels; plastic film for packaging, namely, PVC shrink capsules for wine bottles; Plastic bags for fermenting grapes for wine-making | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wine; Wine making supplies, namely, wine-making kits comprising dried and wet grape skins, prepared grape juice, prepared grape juice concentrates, aseptically packed grape juice, aseptically packed grape juice concentrates, fruit juice, fruit juice concentrates, wine concentrates, yeast, enzymes, preservatives and flavor additives for making wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |