USPTO serial 88735815
CLOUDWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOPKINS, SARAH COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOUDWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelly P. McCarthy
Kelly P. McCarthy Sideman & Bancroft LLPOne Embarcadero Center, Suite 2200San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advisory services for business management; business organisation consulting; business advisory services, namely, consulting in the field of cloud-based and cloud-enabled businesses; business advisory services, namely, enterprise performance management in the nature of analyzing and compiling data for business strategy and financial planning; business advisory services, namely, enterprise resource planning in the nature of analyzing and compiling data on tangible and intangible assets for accounting purposes, human resources management, manufacturing process management, order processing, supply chain management, project management, and customer relationship management; consulting services in the field of human capital management, namely, utilizing technology for the promotion of employee retention, career growth and increased productivity for employees and employers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer programming; computer software consulting; computer systems integration services; computer systems monitoring services for tracking application software performance, performing periodic maintenance, and providing reports and alerts concerning such performance; computer software services and computer software consulting, namely, technological consulting for cloud-based and cloud-enabled businesses; providing information on cloud technological solutions, namely, technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; non-downloadable computer software for use in enterprise performance management, namely, analyzing and compiling data for business strategy and financial planning; non-downloadable computer software for use in robotic process automation, namely, developing, implementing, and monitoring robotic systems for industrial and commercial enterprises; technological consulting services in the field of robotics process automation, namely, developing, implementing, and monitoring robotic systems for industrial and commercial enterprises; application managed services in the nature of technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; providing non-downloadable software for enterprise resource planning, namely, analyzing and compiling data on tangible and intangible assets for accounting purposes, human resources management, manufacturing process management, order processing, supply chain management, project management, and customer relationship management; providing non-downloadable computer software for use in human capital management, namely, human resources management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2022 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 19, 2022 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 17, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 17, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |