USPTO serial 88737969
SNOW MAPPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SNOW MAPPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Honolulu, HI
HONOLULU, HI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lindsay J. Hulley
Lindsay J. Hulley RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP611 ANTON BOULEVARD14TH FLOORCOSTA MESA, CA 92626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile application for routing and real time navigation indoors and outdoors of ski resorts and ski slopes; Downloadable mobile application for receiving and providing information about the condition of ski slopes and weather; Downloadable mobile application for the transmission of messages and other data for the facilitation of communications between two or multiple users at and around ski resorts via computer networks, communication networks and the global information network; Downloadable mobile application for receiving and sharing data about snow-related activities at and around ski resorts; Downloadable augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of navigating ski resorts, ski slopes, and ski and weather conditions; downloadable mobile software application for ski resort operation analytics; all of the foregoing excluding road itineraries and tourism information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2022 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |