USPTO serial 88739931
NFX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NFX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN R COLEMAN
BRIAN R COLEMAN PERKINS COIE LLP3150 PORTER DRPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Financing services; Financial consultation; Investment management; Providing venture capital, development capital, private equity and investment funding; Venture capital advisory services; Venture capital financing; Venture capital fund management; Venture capital services, namely, providing financing to emerging and start-up companies; Financial services, namely, raising money for the hedge funds of others; Financial services, namely, investment advice, investment management, investment consultation and investment of funds for others, including private and public equity and debt investment services; Investment services, namely, asset acquisition, consultation, development and management services, all of the foregoing not in the field of derivatives; all of the foregoing in connection with assisting startup companies and venture capitalists, and none of the foregoing in connection with conducting a derivatives exchange or providing data or information relating to derivatives markets | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Intent to Use) Providing on-line publications in the nature of news articles featuring venture capital, development capital, private equity and investment funding; all of the foregoing in connection with assisting startup companies and venture capitalists, and none of the foregoing in connection with conducting a derivatives exchange or providing data or information relating to derivatives markets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |