Drawing for ENERGY HARBOR

USPTO serial 88741820

ENERGY HARBOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGY HARBOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE R. FENSTERMAKER

JULIE R. FENSTERMAKER BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP200 PUBLIC SQUARESUITE 2300CLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Consulting services relating to the installation and maintenance of equipment used to improve customers' energy efficiency, power co-generation equipment and power supply equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2021NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 11, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 11, 2021DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2021TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Mar 12, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 12, 2021OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 4, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 30, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 2, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance