Drawing for EN ENGINEERING

USPTO serial 88741868

EN ENGINEERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EN ENGINEERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grant H. Peters

GRANT H. PETERS BARNES & THORNBURG LLPP.O. BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software development for others in the fields of chemicals production, energy, manufacturing, and transportation; commissioning services for others in the nature of on-site validation and testing of all installed control systems to confirm proper functionality and to ensure control and protection systems perform as designed and specified based on established industry standards in the fields of chemicals production, energy, manufacturing, and transportation; and custom design, development, and systems design integration for others of: information systems, batching automation, material handling, packaging automation, and quality control in the chemicals production and manufacturing fields, monitoring and management systems for storage facilities, compressor stations, pumping stations, control centers, gas turbine peaking plants, hydroelectric generating facilities, pipelines, and utilities in the energy field, and rail yard operations, communications, and track switching controls automation in the transportation fieldACTIVEJan 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance