USPTO serial 88742787
AYLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STURMAN, MELISSA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AYLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M. Kent
EVAN M. KENT MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP2049 CENTURY PARK EAST18TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Customer care services, including providing customer relationship management online or on the telephone for the websites of others, all related to online distribution of audiovisual content; provide advice and information about customer services and product management and prices on Internet sites in connection with purchases made over the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Publishing and reporting; providing of training; entertainment services; development, creation, production and post-production services of multimedia content; post-production services of multimedia content; post-production editing services for commercials, videos, games and films; editing of texts for advertising purposes, namely, on websites, games and social media; post-production editing services for commercials, videos and films; and advice, consultancy and information for the aforesaid, included in the class | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer design services; computer diagnostic services; computer graphics design services; computer network configuration services; computer network security services; computer programming services; computer programming services for commercial analysis and reporting; computer services in the form of filtering unwanted e-mails; computer site design services; computer software consulting; computer software project management services; computer systems integration services; computer systems monitoring services; consultation services relating to computer software; design, creation, hosting and maintenance of internet sites for third parties; designing and developing webpages on the internet for others; drafting services; graphic arts design; graphic illustration services for others; maintenance of software for Internet access; product design consulting services; product development services; product packaging design services; providing quality assurance in the field of computer software; technical support in the form of monitoring global computer network systems; technical support services in the form of troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |