USPTO serial 88747254
RTX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RTX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Park City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd D. Wakefield
P. O. BOX 983056PARK CITY, UT 84098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customer or user engagement using conversational artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customer or user engagement using conversational artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in facilitating customer or user engagement using conversational artificial intelligence; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in facilitating customer or user engagement using conversational artificial intelligence; Application service provider (ASP) featuring application-to-person (A2P) software for use in one-way text message communication from customer or user engagement using conversational artificial intelligence; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for customer or user engagement using conversational artificial intelligence; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of customer or user engagement using conversational artificial intelligence; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the purpose of customer or user engagement using conversational artificial intelligence; Intelligent natural language understanding services using cloud-based software technology | PARTIALLY PAID | Sep 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2020 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |