Drawing for QPAY

USPTO serial 88749566

QPAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QPAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Slavick

Scott J. Slavick BARACK FERRAZZANO KIRSCHBAUM & NAGELBERG LLP200 WEST MADISON STREET, SUITE 3900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, handheld computers and portable media players, namely, software for organizing, tracking, sharing and analyzing patient health files; Downloadable computer software platforms for use in the healthcare industry for organizing, tracking, sharing and analyzing patient health files; Downloadable computer software for use in the healthcare industry for organizing, tracking, sharing and analyzing patient health filesACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of organizing, tracking, sharing and analyzing patient health files; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for organizing, tracking, sharing and analyzing patient health files; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for organizing, tracking, sharing and analyzing patient health filesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 28, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2020AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2020PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance