USPTO serial 88750665
TRUE & SIMPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADEYIGA,ADETAYO JANET
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUE & SIMPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly N. Fisher
Kimberly N. Fisher Kolitch Romano Dascenzo Gates LLC621 SW Morrison Street #1100Portland, OR 97205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat based snack foods; sliced meat; dried meat; marinated meat; preserved meat; canned meat; luncheon meats; packaged meat; cooked and prepared meats; fresh, refrigerated and processed meats; smoked meats; cured meats; deli meats; bacon; sausage; sausage products of all types, namely, fresh, cooked, smoked, processed and dried sausage products, namely, ham sausage, beef sausage, chicken sausage, turkey sausage, mushroom sausage, summer sausage, tongue sausage, beer sausage, liver sausage; salami; paté; pepperoni; jerky made from meat; roast beef; ham; ready to eat meat products that require minor preparation and assembly | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |