Drawing for PUZZLE LEGENDS

USPTO serial 88754967

PUZZLE LEGENDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUZZLE LEGENDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Liss

Mark J. Liss LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Joysticks for use with computers, other than for video games; Downloadable game software; Computer operating programs, recorded; Video game cartridges; Memory cards for video game machines; Computer game programmes downloadable via the Internet; Recorded computer game software; Computer game software, downloadable; Recorded computer game programs; Wearable activity trackersACTIVE—
041Education services, namely, providing tutoring in the field of business; Organization of electronic game competitions; Mobile library services; Non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines, and brochures in the field of business; Providing online music, not downloadable; Providing amusement arcade services; Virtual reality game services provided on-line from a computer network; Toy rental; Games equipment rental; Animal trainingACTIVE—
042Technological research in the field of computer hardware systems, computer software, renewable energy resources; Material testing; Packaging design; Industrial design; Dress designing; Computer programming; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Computer software design; Installation of computer software; Graphic arts designACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance