USPTO serial 88758703
COLAB FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLAB FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLARENCE GREEN
CLARENCE GREEN PERMAN & GREEN LLP99 HAWLEY LNSTRATFORD, MA 06614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LABORATORY, SCIENTIFIC, AND MODULAR TESTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CENTRIFUGES, AUTOMATED INCUBATORS FOR SMALL SAMLE CONTAINERS, AND AUTOMATED TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, NAMELY, TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED CABINETS SPECIFICALLY ADAPTED FOR STORAGE OF BIOLOGICAL, MEDICAL, PATHOLOGICAL, AND CHEMICAL SAMPLE CONTAINERS, SUCH CABINETS USED WITH ROBOTIC SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF FIXED AND/OR MOBILE ROBOTS SPECIFICALLY ADAPTED FOR AUTOMATED TRANSPORT FOR HANDLING, PLACEMENT AND RETRIEVAL OF BIOLOGICAL, MEDICAL, PATHOLOGICAL, AND CHEMICAL SAMPLE CONTAINERS; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF FIXED AND/OR MOBILE ROBOTS SPECIFICALLY ADAPTED FOR AUTOMATED TRANSPORT FOR HANDLING, PLACEMENT AND RETRIEVAL OF BIOLOGICAL, MEDICAL, PATHOLOGICAL, AND CHEMICAL SAMPLE CONTAINERS; AUTOMATED EQUIPMENT FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH TOOLS, NAMELY, LIQUID HANDLING ROBOTIC WORKSTATIONS SPECIFICALLY ADAPTED FOR HANDLING, STORAGE AND TESTING OF BIOLOGICAL, MEDICAL, PATHOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SAMPLES, ROBOTIC PIPETTING WORKSTATIONS SPECIFICALLY ADAPTED FOR HANDLING, STORAGE AND TESTING OF BIOLOGICAL, MEDICAL, PATHOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SAMPLES, AND ROBOTIC SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF FIXED AND/OR MOBILE ROBOTS, OPERATING SOFTWARE, CAMERAS, COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, SENSORS AND COMPUTING DEVICES, FOR HANDLING, STORAGE AND TESTING OF BIOLOGICAL, MEDICAL, PATHOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SAMPLES; ALL OF THE ABOVE EXCLUDING GOODS USED IN SURGICAL OR MEDICAL PROCEDURES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |