Drawing for OPTIMIZE|RX

USPTO serial 88759878

OPTIMIZE|RX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIMIZE|RX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meredith Lowry

Meredith Lowry WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP3333 PINNACLE HILLS PARKWAY SUITE 510ROGERS, AR 72758UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Collection and analysis of quality metric data for pharmacies for business purposes; Business services provided to the healthcare industry, namely, the collection, reporting, and analysis of pharmacy data for business purposes; Information and data compiling and analyzing relating to business managementACTIVEJan 1, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 27, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 24, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 26, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 26, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance