USPTO serial 88764281
CBD FOR A BETTER LIFE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 610
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CBD FOR A BETTER LIFE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line wholesale and retail store services featuring herbal CBD products, namely, beauty extracts for cosmetic use, all containing CBD derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis | TERMINATED | Jul 7, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2022 | KNOT | NOTICE OF TERMINATION – EMAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | KONO | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS - NOTICE EMAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | KBOC | TERMINATED AFTER SANCTIONS | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | KOFS | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | KSNR | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - PENDING SCO | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | KSAD | SUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | KSCO | SHOW CAUSE ORDER | — |
| May 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |