USPTO serial 88764640
WHY WE RISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHY WE RISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Markus B. Hopkins
Markus B. Hopkins MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP11355 W. OLYMPIC BLVD.LOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Information in the field of government affairs; Providing public policy information in the fields of government assistance, and accessibility and management of public resources; Promoting public awareness of the impacts of social injustice, poverty, homelessness, incarceration, drug abuse, trauma, sexual assault, bullying, and discrimination and disadvantage due to race, culture, socio-economic status and sexual orientation, and accessibility of government programs and public resources; Providing information in the fields of government funding for and accessibility of public programs, services and resources regarding the impacts of social injustice, poverty, homelessness, incarceration, drug abuse, trauma, sexual assault, bullying, discrimination and disadvantage due to race, culture, socio-economic status and sexual orientation, and accessibility of government programs and public resources; Organizing and conducting volunteer programs and community service projects | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2020 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 5, 2020 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |