Drawing for H HEIDI KLUM

USPTO serial 88765756

H HEIDI KLUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H HEIDI KLUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lara A. Holzman

Lara A. Holzman CULHANE MEADOWS PLLC13101 Preston RoadSUITE 110-1520Dallas, TX 75240

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitation leather bags; bags, namely, courier bags, backpacks, ballet bags, duffle bags, overnight bags, messenger bags, cross body bags, pocket books, cosmetic bags sold empty, tote bags, wristlets, weekend bags, hand bags, drawstring bags, hip bags, waist bags, belt bags, suitcases, purses; luggage; wallets; key cases; leather and imitation leather goods, namely, luggage tags, baggage tags, purses, coin purses; umbrellasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 3, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 14, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance