USPTO serial 88768837
VIDALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann K. Ford
Ann K. Ford DLA PIPER LLP (US)500 EIGHTH STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Almond milk; almond milk for culinary purposes; almond milk-based beverages; bone oil for food; butter; cocoa butter for food; coconut butter being edible fat made from coconuts; coconut fat; coconut milk; coconut milk for culinary purposes; coconut milk-based beverages; coconut oil for food; extra virgin olive oil for food; fat-containing mixtures for bread slices, namely, edible fats; edible fats; fat substances for preparing edible fat; linseed oil for food; maize oil for food; margarine; milk based beverages; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk shakes; milk substitutes; oils for food; olive oil for food; palm kernel oil for food; palm oil for food; colza oil for food; sesame oil for food; soya bean oil for food; sunflower oil for food; yogurt; all the above excluding goods made with or flavored with onions | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Biscuits; bread rolls; bread; breadcrumbs; buns; cakes; cereal bars; preparations made from cereals, namely, breads, muffins and cookies; cereal-based snack food; chocolate; chocolate-based beverages with milk; chocolate-based beverages; cocoa; cocoa beverages with milk; cocoa-based beverages; coffee; coffee beverages with milk; coffee-based beverages; crackers; croissants; croûtons; gluten-free bread; high-protein cereal bars; mayonnaise; muesli; pains au chocolat; pastries; pies; tea; tea-based beverages; unleavened bread; buttercream icing; all the above excluding goods made with or flavored with onions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Team Foods Colombia S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Team Foods Colombia S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named VIDALIA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 24, 2021 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |