USPTO serial 88769992
HIWIN MIKROSYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIWIN MIKROSYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John R. Guice, Jr.
John R. Guice, Jr. GUICE PATENTS PLLC9532 LIBERIA AVENUE, # 805MANASSAS, VA 20110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Lifts, other than ski-lifts; road sweeping machines, self-propelled; housings; stands for machines; woodworking machines; threading machines; knives; milling machines; hangers; lathes; cigarette machines for industrial purposes; bending machines; cutters; elevator belts/lift belts; leather-working machines; sorting machines for industry; starters for motors and engines; leather paring machines; generators of electricity; elevating apparatus; feeders; wrapping machines; metal drawing; machines; blowing machines for the compression, exhaustion and transport of gases; hydraulic turbines; driving motors, other than for land vehicles; machine tools; metalworking machines; speed governors for machines, engines and motors; suction machines for industrial purposes; air pumps; pumps for heating installations; vacuum pumps; bookbinding apparatus and machines for industrial purposes; sealing machines for industrial purposes; stators; tables for machines; transmissions for machines; compressed air machines; compressed air pumps; motors for boats; shredders for industrial use; handling machines, automatic; industrial robots; water separators/drain cocks; cranes; radiators for motors and engines; elevator chains; packaging machines; vibrators for industrial use; wind turbines; elevator operating apparatus/lift operating apparatus; self-regulating fuel pumps; 3D printers; pneumatic waste oil drainers; industrial inkjet printing machines; Motor drives, namely, drives for servo motor and stepper motor; machine operated precision positioning platform for computer numerical control machine used for precision processing; direct current motors; electric motors for machines; electric starter motors; elevator motors; linear motors; semiconductor wafer processing equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |